Session 25 · February 2026

Alternative Relationship Models

What if the relationship escalator isn't the only ride?

↓ Materials ↓ Session structure

Society scripts a specific life arc — get together, move in together, buy a house, get married, have children — and this session asked why, and what we lose when we follow it by default. We explored friendship, polyamory, solo living, and platonic co-housing as relationship forms that deserve to be named and taken seriously. The session closed on a key takeaway: this is not a competition, and no model is inherently better than another.

Materials
Main
Supplementary
Session structure
  1. What is the norm, according to you?
    • Relationship escalator: get together → move in → buy → marry → children
    • What would be possible in your own culture or upbringing?
    • Which relationship forms have you experienced — now or in the past?
  2. Definitions (introduced by Dana)
    • Metamour: the partner of your partner
    • Polycule: a connected network of people in consensually non-monogamous relationships
    • Nesting partner: the partner you live with
    • Compersion: feeling joy for someone else's joy — being happy for your partner on a date with someone else
    • Kitchen Table Polyamory: all partners get along well enough to share a meal
    • Open relationship vs polyamory vs ethical non-monogamy: no fixed definitions — use what fits
  3. Romantic relationships
    • Societal pressure to conform to normative relationships
    • Is having a boyfriend embarrassing now?
    • Pressure from family, culture, class
  4. Friendship as a primary relationship
    • Why does friendship get so little cultural status compared to romantic partnership?
    • What would it look like to treat friendship as a primary commitment?
  5. Housing and community
    • Do we really need a romantic partner to live with?
    • Co-housing, intentional communities — only for people who never left their village, or a real option?
    • What happens when you move countries? How do you build community?
  6. Takeaway
    • It's not a vs question — no model is better than another
    • What would you change in how we talk about relationships?

Comments are reviewed by the organisers before appearing here.